ImmiUser
07-12 11:40 PM
I might had refresh immigration-law and travel.state.gov websites atleast for 100 times in last half an hour just to get glimpse of Aug bulletin :(
wallpaper Hayek Wallpaper 1920x1200
vgayalu
04-04 10:46 AM
IV core guys need not to worry about any kind of comments.
There will be barking dogs always behind an Elephant.
We support IV Core Guys. Go ahead.
There will be barking dogs always behind an Elephant.
We support IV Core Guys. Go ahead.
amitjoey
05-21 06:58 PM
hey can i call u or u call me if i PM u my fone number ?
I have no idea what the lawyers sent. Lot of it was my employers financial statements, ability to pay and profit-loss statements (I guess). I was not privy to any of this.
send me a PM with ur no, will call you.
I have no idea what the lawyers sent. Lot of it was my employers financial statements, ability to pay and profit-loss statements (I guess). I was not privy to any of this.
send me a PM with ur no, will call you.
2011 fuck you wallpaper 1920x1200
eagerr2i
02-07 04:02 PM
This came in the newswire today about the challenges being faced in UK amongst the people who entered UK under the high skilled immigration program. Do do our stories in US have any similarity here?
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Disenfranchised_Indians_take_to_streets_in_London/articleshow/msid-1142198,curpg-1.cms
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Disenfranchised_Indians_take_to_streets_in_London/articleshow/msid-1142198,curpg-1.cms
more...
dixie
02-05 08:18 PM
USCIS cannot generate visas out of thin air, nor can it waive the per-country cap. Its job is to implement the law, not to make them. It does, however, have the ptoential to do a LOT of harm, thanks to its notorious inefficiency. It is a telling statement on our current sorry state of affairs that USCIS is the least of our concerns at the moment.
Sometimes I think that rather than writing to these politicians ,we should write to USCIS.This retrogression is caused by them.They didn't wait for any bill to be passed for this retrogression.There is no use of talking to politicians,they don't care.
I know that USCIS will not care either but USCIS did it out of nowhere ,till sep2005,everything was fine for them and suddenly in oct 2005,they put us in backward direction.Now after a year and a half ,we are at the same spot,waiting for the visa bulletin and staying depressed for a day or two after seeing it.
I don't know .I am so mad at everybody.
Sorry for the ranting.
Btw,i have already sent emails to USCIS and chicago tribune regarding this .
Sometimes I think that rather than writing to these politicians ,we should write to USCIS.This retrogression is caused by them.They didn't wait for any bill to be passed for this retrogression.There is no use of talking to politicians,they don't care.
I know that USCIS will not care either but USCIS did it out of nowhere ,till sep2005,everything was fine for them and suddenly in oct 2005,they put us in backward direction.Now after a year and a half ,we are at the same spot,waiting for the visa bulletin and staying depressed for a day or two after seeing it.
I don't know .I am so mad at everybody.
Sorry for the ranting.
Btw,i have already sent emails to USCIS and chicago tribune regarding this .
rk07
09-27 02:19 PM
All,
Anyone applied on July 23rd at NSC and not received the RN?
Anyone in the same boat with me?
Thanks,
-rk.
Anyone applied on July 23rd at NSC and not received the RN?
Anyone in the same boat with me?
Thanks,
-rk.
more...
pappu
02-09 11:42 AM
IV is in touch with USCIS, Admin officials as well and continuing our efforts with lawmakers. A year ago it was difficult to imagine. We have covered lot of ground in the past one year and this year due to the support of all our members we feel very motivated. Visa bulletins are very negative and let it be an inspiration for all of us to work harder to get rid of retrogression.
2010 wallpaper 1920x1200 image
amitjoey
04-19 01:07 PM
I understand that your intention is to get heard. I appreciate your effort at writing letter. However writing to the president will not help us much. Here is why:
In the USA, infact for that matter in most democracies, Laws are made by elected representatives unless it is an executive order to grant an immediate relief.
The composition and powers of the House and the Senate are established in Article One of the Constitution. The major power of the House is to pass federal legislation that affects the entire country, although its bills must also be passed by the Senate and further agreed to by the President before becoming law (unless both the House and Senate re-pass the legislation with a two-thirds majority in each chamber). The total number of voting representatives is fixed by law at no more than 435.[1] (United States congressional apportionment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_congressional_apportionment))
So, In our case, the president at the most can sympathise with our cause and the hardships we face because of the limbo, But he cannot really help until there is a bill that passes both the house and the senate.
So, Can I suggest that it will be even more worthwhile if you contact your congressman/woman and go meet them. We need them to understand our plight and anguish.
We all need to go meet our lawmakers, educate them.
In the USA, infact for that matter in most democracies, Laws are made by elected representatives unless it is an executive order to grant an immediate relief.
The composition and powers of the House and the Senate are established in Article One of the Constitution. The major power of the House is to pass federal legislation that affects the entire country, although its bills must also be passed by the Senate and further agreed to by the President before becoming law (unless both the House and Senate re-pass the legislation with a two-thirds majority in each chamber). The total number of voting representatives is fixed by law at no more than 435.[1] (United States congressional apportionment - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_congressional_apportionment))
So, In our case, the president at the most can sympathise with our cause and the hardships we face because of the limbo, But he cannot really help until there is a bill that passes both the house and the senate.
So, Can I suggest that it will be even more worthwhile if you contact your congressman/woman and go meet them. We need them to understand our plight and anguish.
We all need to go meet our lawmakers, educate them.
more...
gsrknth
03-09 05:02 PM
I would suggest you to renew it here in US. If you don't have time to mail in and receive , then you can visit the consulate and get in back the same day. I am sure it would lot of time in India :-)
hair Wallpaper (1920x1200)
jnicklo
04-18 12:06 AM
:thumb: :thumb: :thumb: :thumb:
more...
kokil
03-05 05:22 PM
Dear Snathan,
Please guide me in detail when you say no use. This is very imp for me to understand.
Please guide me in detail when you say no use. This is very imp for me to understand.
hot Deadmau5 Wallpaper 1920X1200
pd_recapturing
03-16 02:14 PM
Stop advertising a lawyer. I find him very speculative. He wants everyone to come to his site and you are falling for it.
Teli,
Which line of my post suggests that I am advertising for him? If someone posts a link from a news paper, does it mean that he/she is advertising for the news paper. I just found it on his website and found it relevant for us so I posted it. For your information, I am not his client.
Teli,
Which line of my post suggests that I am advertising for him? If someone posts a link from a news paper, does it mean that he/she is advertising for the news paper. I just found it on his website and found it relevant for us so I posted it. For your information, I am not his client.
more...
house 1920x1200 hd wallpaper.
ajju
08-29 03:56 PM
And Code 1 means red alert uh
Code 1 = if you applied EAD only (Index Fingers + Photo)
Code 2 = if you applied I-485 only (All Fingers only - FBI Name Check)
Code 3 = if you applied I=485 + EAD
I may have code 1 & 2 reversed :-) But thats the overall concept...
Code 1 = if you applied EAD only (Index Fingers + Photo)
Code 2 = if you applied I-485 only (All Fingers only - FBI Name Check)
Code 3 = if you applied I=485 + EAD
I may have code 1 & 2 reversed :-) But thats the overall concept...
tattoo Dusk Wallpaper 1920X1200
skynet2500
08-28 10:03 PM
I got my Wife's and son's passports renewed at NY. I printed the phtos on the computer. My wife's i mailed it(got it back in 1 week). My sons i went to NY. If you go before 11AM, you can collect it back same evening. I did this almost 18 months ago.
Hope this helps
Thanks for the response. Did you use 3.5cm x 3.5cm?
Hope this helps
Thanks for the response. Did you use 3.5cm x 3.5cm?
more...
pictures 50 Best Wallpaper 1920x1200
smodekurti
10-04 11:48 AM
I live in Chicago too.....
dresses edgy wallpaper 1920x1200
HV000
10-05 04:13 PM
No LUD Update (NSC) for the last 2 days after FP. But EAD card has been ordered. Its very difficult to predict how they operate.
more...
makeup wallpaper Wallpapers 1920x1200
satishku_2000
11-19 02:10 PM
It only makes me wonder how many more applications with PDS older than 2001 (substitution or not ) from India are still pending :( . Good luck to all of you guys who has PD older than mine (Sep 2004 EB3), unless you are out of the queue I dont get mine :)
girlfriend 2011 Reina 1920x1200 Wallpaper
grimus
05-24 12:53 PM
webfax sent.:)
hairstyles Natasha Yi Wallpaper 1920x1200
JunRN
01-10 05:31 PM
That's why I was saying that if he did work for more than 180 days for the employer, his GC is safe. If not, it can be rescinded if the employer appeal to the I-140 denial of the labor sub. and tries to prove that the original beneficiary is a "fraud".
It can happen to anyone. So to be on the safe side, work for the original petitioner for more than 180 days. If the petitioner is a GC factory, then both beneficiaries will suffer.
Yeah, it's good to know that AC21 works and that one labor is not used to produce many GCs.
It can happen to anyone. So to be on the safe side, work for the original petitioner for more than 180 days. If the petitioner is a GC factory, then both beneficiaries will suffer.
Yeah, it's good to know that AC21 works and that one labor is not used to produce many GCs.
smisachu
06-20 03:25 PM
Thanks Chandu. IV- Tristate leadership has been great. I hope the other chapters catch up.
You are right. Thanks for the great job in the chapter
You are right. Thanks for the great job in the chapter
swo
07-13 02:28 PM
Notwithstanding the good research below...
Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.
Given this is legislation, I don't think rule changes can trump it. I don't believe per country limits will change. Besides, how is that a solution to anything? This is not an Indian or Chinese issue. It's a legal immigrant issue.
See pg CRS-5 of document http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/84914.pdf
Two important exceptions to the per-country ceilings have been enacted in the
past decade. Foremost is an exception for certain family-sponsored immigrants.
More specifically, the INA states that 75% of the visas allocated to spouses and
children of LPRs (2ndA family preference) are not subject to the per-country ceiling.18
Prior to FY2001, employment-based preference immigrants were also held to percountry
ceilings. The American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act
of 2000 (P.L. 106-313) enabled the per-country ceilings for employment-based
immigrants to be surpassed for individual countries that are oversubscribed as long
as visas are available within the worldwide limit for employment-based preferences.
The impact of these revisions to the per-country ceilings is discussed later in this
report......................
Section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) sets an annual minimum family-sponsored preference limit of 226,000. The worldwide level for annual employment-based preference immigrants is 140,000. Section 202 prescribes that the per-country limit for preference immigrants is set at 7% of the total annual family-sponsored and employment-based preference limits, i.e., 25,620. The dependent area limit is set at 2%, or 7,320.
Given this is legislation, I don't think rule changes can trump it. I don't believe per country limits will change. Besides, how is that a solution to anything? This is not an Indian or Chinese issue. It's a legal immigrant issue.
See pg CRS-5 of document http://fpc.state.gov/documents/organization/84914.pdf
Two important exceptions to the per-country ceilings have been enacted in the
past decade. Foremost is an exception for certain family-sponsored immigrants.
More specifically, the INA states that 75% of the visas allocated to spouses and
children of LPRs (2ndA family preference) are not subject to the per-country ceiling.18
Prior to FY2001, employment-based preference immigrants were also held to percountry
ceilings. The American Competitiveness in the Twenty-First Century Act
of 2000 (P.L. 106-313) enabled the per-country ceilings for employment-based
immigrants to be surpassed for individual countries that are oversubscribed as long
as visas are available within the worldwide limit for employment-based preferences.
The impact of these revisions to the per-country ceilings is discussed later in this
report......................
No comments:
Post a Comment