starving_dog
05-27 11:34 AM
I believe that the illegal immigrant issue is the sticky whicket and that section of the legislation will be slashed and burned.
For us, I think that the House will want a reduction in EB visas. They may go for removing the dependent's counting against the quota to even it out.
Just a humble opinion. IV keep up the good work and remember, you can't please all the people all the time.
For us, I think that the House will want a reduction in EB visas. They may go for removing the dependent's counting against the quota to even it out.
Just a humble opinion. IV keep up the good work and remember, you can't please all the people all the time.
wallpaper G.O.A.T. - Michael Jordan
HypEss9
08-30 10:30 AM
If I have an advance parole valid till 01 Januray 2011 (for example) and I want to come back from India on 20 January 2011. I have applied a new advance parole for this journey. But if I will apply transit visa of UK and submit the AP that is valid till 01 Jan 2011 (as I will receive a new AP after 90 days of filing) what will be the validity of transit visa? Will it be 6 months or will it be last date on my AP? What I need to do while travelling back if validity of transit visa is based on current AP and not on renewed AP? Please suggest. Thanks.
learning01
05-24 12:47 PM
again. It is gone. That means you had sent the web fax.
I just sent the webfax..
One silly question.. How do we know it is actually sent ?
I just sent the webfax..
One silly question.. How do we know it is actually sent ?
2011 michael-jordan-wallpaper-3.jpg
NolaIndian32
07-28 05:01 PM
If you sign the agreement, yes, it will be legally binding or as you put it "stand in court of law". Is the agreement written to only suit the purposes for the employer? Yes. Would I sign it? No.
You need to speak to an attorney. The language which ties to this employer until a project is completed might go against the "employment at will" law - not sure what the status is in NJ.
Once you complete a timesheet, an employer should pay you considering the timesheet is appropriate and not fraudulent. If the employer does not get paid by the client, that liability should not shift to you in terms of asking you pay back your paycheck.
I am not a lawyer (only a liaison to the legal eagles), please seek legal advise.
You need to speak to an attorney. The language which ties to this employer until a project is completed might go against the "employment at will" law - not sure what the status is in NJ.
Once you complete a timesheet, an employer should pay you considering the timesheet is appropriate and not fraudulent. If the employer does not get paid by the client, that liability should not shift to you in terms of asking you pay back your paycheck.
I am not a lawyer (only a liaison to the legal eagles), please seek legal advise.
more...
HV000
04-03 02:23 PM
nope, so far I have not come across a single case where this has been an issue (which was one reason I went ahead with the move). However there have been inklings about USCIS possibly taking a tougher position on this in the future.
For instance see:
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_porret.html
Salary Considerations for the New Job
�MurthyDotCom
Attorneys in our firm are frequently asked about the impact of a difference in salary when changing jobs under AC21. We are also asked what "same or similar" really means in order for one to be eligible under AC21 portability. USCIS policy memoranda, particularly the May 12, 2005 Memo referenced above, have been quite favorable on these matters. However, in that same memo, the USCIS stated that the forthcoming AC21 regulations "may take a more restrictive position than this memorandum." Therefore, while issues such as salary differences do not appear to be problematic at present, foreshadowing indicates that this could change when the regulations are released at some future date.
From my research I have found so far that it will be hard for them to put a dollar or percentage figure on the amount the salary can vary. The best they can do is perhaps put it in some range based on prevailing wages. Other than that, salary itself is a very market driven thing. I hope they dont, and I dont think it buys them much. The DOT codes and job-duties description should be what they should look at (or actually they should broaden the allowed job changes considering how long the wait has become now-a-days).
Lets see what happens. Main trouble is like what Murthy mentions in that article a little later: if changes happen, they are retroactive...
Thanks for the reply but how did you conclude 'Future AC21 Changes' will be retroactive?
For instance see:
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_porret.html
Salary Considerations for the New Job
�MurthyDotCom
Attorneys in our firm are frequently asked about the impact of a difference in salary when changing jobs under AC21. We are also asked what "same or similar" really means in order for one to be eligible under AC21 portability. USCIS policy memoranda, particularly the May 12, 2005 Memo referenced above, have been quite favorable on these matters. However, in that same memo, the USCIS stated that the forthcoming AC21 regulations "may take a more restrictive position than this memorandum." Therefore, while issues such as salary differences do not appear to be problematic at present, foreshadowing indicates that this could change when the regulations are released at some future date.
From my research I have found so far that it will be hard for them to put a dollar or percentage figure on the amount the salary can vary. The best they can do is perhaps put it in some range based on prevailing wages. Other than that, salary itself is a very market driven thing. I hope they dont, and I dont think it buys them much. The DOT codes and job-duties description should be what they should look at (or actually they should broaden the allowed job changes considering how long the wait has become now-a-days).
Lets see what happens. Main trouble is like what Murthy mentions in that article a little later: if changes happen, they are retroactive...
Thanks for the reply but how did you conclude 'Future AC21 Changes' will be retroactive?
nviren
05-24 12:23 PM
Webfax #15 sent.
more...
desi3933
03-18 03:26 PM
.....
....
Are H1 is Really in a speciality Occupation?
When we apply 1st time they are asking all the documents which is fine.
When we apply Extension they are asking all the details with Paystubs,client letter.
When we apply Transfer they are asking all the details with Paystubs.
1. Read this pdf. http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/E1eng.pdf This should answer your questions on H-1B
2. Documents are needed to demonstrate that offered job is of specialty occupation and the beneficiary meets job qualification. It also has checks for employer who is offering H-1B job.
3. Pay stubs are needed so as to prove that beneficiary is maintaining valid H-1B status when another H-1B petition is filed.
4. Client Letter is needed so that Employer (petitioner) can demonstrate that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation, or that the petitioner has complied with the terms and conditions of the LCA.
....
Unless theyUSCIS) make a rule like H1 can work for any employer we suffer a lot and feel like slaves which is bad.....
H-1B is not for any job. The job must meet requirements for H-1B. Read the pdf mentioned above.
I am sorry that you feel like sl***, but you do have option of changing the job if you don't like current job and you feel like s****.
Thanks for sharing your "sad" story!
________________
Not a legal advice.
....
Are H1 is Really in a speciality Occupation?
When we apply 1st time they are asking all the documents which is fine.
When we apply Extension they are asking all the details with Paystubs,client letter.
When we apply Transfer they are asking all the details with Paystubs.
1. Read this pdf. http://www.uscis.gov/files/article/E1eng.pdf This should answer your questions on H-1B
2. Documents are needed to demonstrate that offered job is of specialty occupation and the beneficiary meets job qualification. It also has checks for employer who is offering H-1B job.
3. Pay stubs are needed so as to prove that beneficiary is maintaining valid H-1B status when another H-1B petition is filed.
4. Client Letter is needed so that Employer (petitioner) can demonstrate that the proffered position qualifies as a specialty occupation, or that the petitioner has complied with the terms and conditions of the LCA.
....
Unless theyUSCIS) make a rule like H1 can work for any employer we suffer a lot and feel like slaves which is bad.....
H-1B is not for any job. The job must meet requirements for H-1B. Read the pdf mentioned above.
I am sorry that you feel like sl***, but you do have option of changing the job if you don't like current job and you feel like s****.
Thanks for sharing your "sad" story!
________________
Not a legal advice.
2010 Michael Jordan Download
little_willy
04-13 02:06 PM
Great!!! Thanks IV
more...
watzgc
04-22 06:04 PM
Applied for H1 extension at Vermont (Premium Processing).
working for the same client for more than 3 years.
Submitted paystubs, timesheets, w2 etc for RFE..
But still rejected the petition saying he needs a letter from client describing my job duites and responsibilities etc.
Now filing for a motion....
Sjax,
Have you submiited client letter while replying to RFE?
working for the same client for more than 3 years.
Submitted paystubs, timesheets, w2 etc for RFE..
But still rejected the petition saying he needs a letter from client describing my job duites and responsibilities etc.
Now filing for a motion....
Sjax,
Have you submiited client letter while replying to RFE?
hair Back to Michael Jordan
sjhugoose
January 30th, 2004, 11:32 AM
If Paul's hunch that we'll see the 1Ds' successor by September is correct, then we might see cheaper 1D-II bodies prior to that.
As for the Kodak, it certainly has the resolution, but it doesn't seem as if it's generating much enthusiasm. The 1Ds (with less pixels) OTOH has. Removing the very expensive anti-aliasing filter was probably not Kodak's greatest moment.
I think the Kodak has alot more problems than just AA problems!!!
And any time a product drops by 50% in 1 year its normally not a good sign
Scott
As for the Kodak, it certainly has the resolution, but it doesn't seem as if it's generating much enthusiasm. The 1Ds (with less pixels) OTOH has. Removing the very expensive anti-aliasing filter was probably not Kodak's greatest moment.
I think the Kodak has alot more problems than just AA problems!!!
And any time a product drops by 50% in 1 year its normally not a good sign
Scott
more...
helpful_leo
02-23 02:57 PM
2/ What can we do to communicate our agenda to senators and congressmen?
The most effective method is to fax your suggestions to the lawmakers� offices across the country. We should start with the sponsors and co-sponsors of the PACE bill. Pls learn how you can access PACE co-sponsors names in the 3rd post at this thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=151
Also in the above thread (1st post) you will find a word attachment that articulates our basic agenda. Please use material freely from that letter, or even the whole letter itself, to communicate with your lawmakers.
This is the link to contact details and web pages of various senators:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Find your senator�s name and webpage listed there and fax your letters to them at the numbers listed under Contact Me. Pls note that for the most part, you can contact only the senator of your home state. So, for e.g., if you live in New Mexico, you have to contact only the senators from NM. Please include your name, address, phone number and e-mail id in your fax. Due to this limitation, it is very important that we connect with PhDs in various states so that we can contact all senators and congressmen across the country.
Once you fax it to them, they will most likely contact you with questions or to just thank you for your letter/ fax. If you do not hear from them in 3-5 days, it is advisable to call up their office and ask if they received your message and how they are following it up.
The most effective method is to fax your suggestions to the lawmakers� offices across the country. We should start with the sponsors and co-sponsors of the PACE bill. Pls learn how you can access PACE co-sponsors names in the 3rd post at this thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=151
Also in the above thread (1st post) you will find a word attachment that articulates our basic agenda. Please use material freely from that letter, or even the whole letter itself, to communicate with your lawmakers.
This is the link to contact details and web pages of various senators:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
Find your senator�s name and webpage listed there and fax your letters to them at the numbers listed under Contact Me. Pls note that for the most part, you can contact only the senator of your home state. So, for e.g., if you live in New Mexico, you have to contact only the senators from NM. Please include your name, address, phone number and e-mail id in your fax. Due to this limitation, it is very important that we connect with PhDs in various states so that we can contact all senators and congressmen across the country.
Once you fax it to them, they will most likely contact you with questions or to just thank you for your letter/ fax. If you do not hear from them in 3-5 days, it is advisable to call up their office and ask if they received your message and how they are following it up.
hot michael jordan wallpaper
thomachan72
05-27 12:26 PM
My apologies, I thought I was making a point. The point was trying to see and realize that if USCIS was behaving with us this way it is, what would happen if it was a product selling company ? Could it do the same to its customers ? Could customers tolerate it ? Could USCIS have survived ?
But if I could not show it just ignore my thread or Admin , please delete it.
Well I can see where you are comming from. Good analogy, however, you forgot to mention the RFEs/NOIDs? pls fit that too into the agenda of the USCIS TV company.
But if I could not show it just ignore my thread or Admin , please delete it.
Well I can see where you are comming from. Good analogy, however, you forgot to mention the RFEs/NOIDs? pls fit that too into the agenda of the USCIS TV company.
more...
house hair micheal jordan wallpaper.
vaishnavilakshmi
07-10 08:52 PM
Following intresting info is listed on the immigration-law, wish it is true :)
"There has been going around a rumor lately that the USCIS was internally discussing retreat from the 485 rejection decision. It appears that this rumor probably started from the USCIS HQ order over the Texas Service Center to hold all the July 2007 EB-485 applications abeyanbce and not to return the applications to applicants. Unconfirmed sources indicate that because of the order, the Texas Service Center is not returning the EB-485 applications which have been received since July 2, 2007. However, there is no evidence that the decision is necessarily related to its potential decision to withdraw the rejection decision. At this point, its reasons are completion unknown. Please stay tuned. "
Hi,
If it is going to be true,then that is the most happiest news for everyone over here!Hope this happens!!!
Vaishu
"There has been going around a rumor lately that the USCIS was internally discussing retreat from the 485 rejection decision. It appears that this rumor probably started from the USCIS HQ order over the Texas Service Center to hold all the July 2007 EB-485 applications abeyanbce and not to return the applications to applicants. Unconfirmed sources indicate that because of the order, the Texas Service Center is not returning the EB-485 applications which have been received since July 2, 2007. However, there is no evidence that the decision is necessarily related to its potential decision to withdraw the rejection decision. At this point, its reasons are completion unknown. Please stay tuned. "
Hi,
If it is going to be true,then that is the most happiest news for everyone over here!Hope this happens!!!
Vaishu
tattoo Michael Jordan wallpapers
a_paradkar
05-12 04:49 PM
if their is any spill over then
the dates of China and India will be same for EB2 in July VB. then the actual spill over will happen in Aug & Sep... assuming the prediction numbers are true.
the dates of China and India will be same for EB2 in July VB. then the actual spill over will happen in Aug & Sep... assuming the prediction numbers are true.
more...
pictures New Michael Jordan Wallpaper
jonty_11
05-22 03:39 PM
What kind of businesses will give u certificate of work? to prove u were illegal before jan 1 , 2007
dresses Tags: michael jordan girl
muffins
05-31 12:52 PM
Ok I went fast,(two hours) but I'm very happy with the results considering the style I went with.
Here it is:
http://dj-studios.com/battles/televsdj/the_beatdown.jpg
Any chance of a tutorial on the liquid metal effect? Like the hook shape of em also?
Here it is:
http://dj-studios.com/battles/televsdj/the_beatdown.jpg
Any chance of a tutorial on the liquid metal effect? Like the hook shape of em also?
more...
makeup Michael Jordan wallpaper
hpandey
08-20 03:51 PM
I Still think we have a good chance atleast all those with priority date before today.
The economy is not improving and I doubt if it will in next 4-5 years. Even though there is slight improvent the jobless claims went up
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims Rose by 15,000 to 576,000 (Update1) - Bloomberg.com (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aMhGnVzXaSfM)
No way nurses and EB1 would count more than 5-6k per year....
Even out of the 30-40k like I said before about 50% would be from india and china (mostley Eb3) with later priority dates which puts them behind us
Eb2 Filings have drasticaally gone down because of the USCIS rule
Even after giving away all spill over visas to EB2 india and china they will have a lot of visas pending and If USCIS has made the decision that no Visa will go wasted period then we definitely have a great chance
Again my assumption is based on the FACT that USCIS has a policy that all employment Visa numebrs must be used
Lets keep it simple. In the next 4 years there will be 140k * 4 = 560K visas and I would say out of that the only ones with priority before Eb3 india and China are
Eb1 ROW +india & china
EB2 ROW
EB2 India + china (very limited new cases)
and I don't think the above categories would count more than 150k which should leave a lot of pending visas for Eb3
Which would leave a lot of Visa numbers for Eb3 India/china and ROW
Only time would tell if you are right or wrong but I like your view. Shows a ray of hope in an otherwise bleak outlook of the future.
:)
The economy is not improving and I doubt if it will in next 4-5 years. Even though there is slight improvent the jobless claims went up
U.S. Initial Jobless Claims Rose by 15,000 to 576,000 (Update1) - Bloomberg.com (http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aMhGnVzXaSfM)
No way nurses and EB1 would count more than 5-6k per year....
Even out of the 30-40k like I said before about 50% would be from india and china (mostley Eb3) with later priority dates which puts them behind us
Eb2 Filings have drasticaally gone down because of the USCIS rule
Even after giving away all spill over visas to EB2 india and china they will have a lot of visas pending and If USCIS has made the decision that no Visa will go wasted period then we definitely have a great chance
Again my assumption is based on the FACT that USCIS has a policy that all employment Visa numebrs must be used
Lets keep it simple. In the next 4 years there will be 140k * 4 = 560K visas and I would say out of that the only ones with priority before Eb3 india and China are
Eb1 ROW +india & china
EB2 ROW
EB2 India + china (very limited new cases)
and I don't think the above categories would count more than 150k which should leave a lot of pending visas for Eb3
Which would leave a lot of Visa numbers for Eb3 India/china and ROW
Only time would tell if you are right or wrong but I like your view. Shows a ray of hope in an otherwise bleak outlook of the future.
:)
girlfriend This jersey is worth a lot i
imh1b
04-19 09:32 AM
I have sent letter twice. They forward it as it is to USCIS and send a reply back that it has been forwarded to USCIS for action. Then you receive a letter or call from USCIS that your case cannot be considered unless your PD becomes current.
How about you send the USCIS letter back to president again and tell him that this is not what you asked for. You already know PD is not current. The letter was for President to implement a fix A,B and C.
How about you send the USCIS letter back to president again and tell him that this is not what you asked for. You already know PD is not current. The letter was for President to implement a fix A,B and C.
hairstyles michael jordan picture
WAIT_FOR_EVER_GC
03-19 03:59 PM
The people with Master's in STEM are expempt from the cap.
It will benefit them
It will benefit them
matreen
08-04 12:33 PM
Thanks Snathan. But do you think I may get my 140 cleared on the basis of 3 year degree?
Its tough at I-140. But you wont have any issues with EB3
Its tough at I-140. But you wont have any issues with EB3
chanduv23
02-11 11:22 PM
Am I not reading his post right??
Sure - great - lets get this to work :)
Sure - great - lets get this to work :)
No comments:
Post a Comment